Search Results

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	5/591 (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (5/591)

Petrus

Interaction Date	5/591 (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sicilia [Sicily]
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Subdeacon (5/591)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.42 (CCSL 140:54)

ancilla Dei (female) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591)
View Case

before 5/591 - ? (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)

Monastery of Monosteum (in Sicily) [unknown]

unknown

Petrus

Interaction Date	5/591 (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sicilia [Sicily]
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (restores property to sustain her)

Subdeacon (5/591)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	5/591 (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sicilia [Sicily]
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (restores property to her)

Subdeacon (5/591)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.42 (CCSL 140:55)

Opilio (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591)
View Case

8/591 - ? (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)

Church of Venafrum in Campania [Venafro]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (8/591)

Anthemius

Interaction Date	8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Subdeacon (8/591)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.66 (CCSL 140:76)

Servus Dei (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591)
View Case

8/591 - ? (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)

Church of Venafrum in Campania [Venafro]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (8/591)

Anthemius

Interaction Date	8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Subdeacon (8/591)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.66 (CCSL 140:76)

Crescentius (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591)
View Case

8/591 - ? (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)

Church of Venafrum in Campania [Venafro]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (8/591)

Anthemius

Interaction Date	8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Subdeacon (8/591)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.66 (CCSL 140:76)

Paulus (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/593)
View Case

before 7/593 - ? (from: --/7/593 to: --/--/--)

Lilybaeum [Marsala]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	7/593 (from: --/7/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (confirms exile)

Bishop of Rome (7/593)

Gregorius Theodorus

Interaction Date	before 7/593 (from: --/7/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Lilybaeum [Marsala]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (before 7/593)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 3.49 (CCSL 140:195)

Petronella (female) late sixth century (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/593)
View Case

9/593 - ? (from: --/9/593 to: --/--/--)

Lucania [Lucania]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	9/593 (from: --/9/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict?

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (restores her property previously given to monastery)

Bishop of Rome (9/593)

Gregorius Cyprianus

Interaction Date	9/593 (from: --/9/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sicilia [Sicily]
Office	Deacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Deacon (9/593)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 4.6 (CCSL 140:222-3)

Victoria (female) late sixth century (from: --/--/594 to: --/--/594)
View Case

9/594 - ? (from: --/9/594 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	9/594 (from: --/9/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (9/594)

Victor of Palermo

Interaction Date	9/594 (from: --/9/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Panormus [Palermo]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (9/594)

Fantinus

Interaction Date	9/594 (from: --/9/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (discussant of charges)

defensor (9/594)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 5.4 (CCSL 140:270).

Vitalianus (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/594 to: --/--/594)
View Case

11/594 - ? (from: --/11/594 to: --/--/--)

Mediolan(i)um [Milan]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	11/594 (from: --/11/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (11/594)

Constantius of Milan

Interaction Date	11/594 (from: --/11/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (11/594)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 5.18 (CCSL 140:285-6).

Lucillus of Malta (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/598 to: --/--/598)
View Case

10/598 - ? (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)

Melita [Malta]

unknown

Presbyters and deacons in Malta

Interaction Date	10/598 (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Melita [Malta]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (participation in same crime)

(10/598)

Iohannes of Syracuse

Interaction Date	10/598 (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Syracusae [Syracuse]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (10/598)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	10/598 (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (10/598)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 9.25 (CCSL 140A:585-6).

Presbyters and deacons in Malta (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/598 to: --/--/598)
View Case

10/598 - ? (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)

Melita [Malta]

unknown

Iohannes of Syracuse

Interaction Date	10/598 (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Syracusae [Syracuse]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (10/598)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	10/598 (from: --/10/598 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (10/598)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 9.25 (CCSL 140A:585-6).

clerics of Ravenna (male) around 600 (from: --/--/601 to: --/--/601)
View Case

before 2/601 - ? (from: --/2/601 to: --/2/601)

Ravenna [Ravenna]

Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]

unknown

Iohannes of Ravenna

Interaction Date	before 2/601 (from: --/2/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Ravenna [Ravenna]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (before 2/601)

Romanus of Sicily

Interaction Date	before 2/601 (from: --/2/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sicilia [Sicily]
Office	defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

defensor (before 2/601)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	2/601 (from: --/2/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (2/601)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 11.24 (CCSL 140A:894-5).

Ianuarius of Malaga (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/590 to: --/--/603)
View Case

589/550 - ? (from: --/--/589 to: --/8/603)

Malaca [Malaga]

unknown

Comitiolus

Interaction Date	589/90 (from: --/--/589 to: --/--/590)
Interaction Location	Hispania [Spain]
Office	magister militum per Spanias
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

magister militum per Spanias (589/90)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	8/603 (from: --/8/603 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (instigator of enquiry to review exile)

Bishop of Rome (8/603)

Iohannes (defensor)

Interaction Date	8/603 (from: --/8/603 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Hispania [Spain]
Office	defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support?

Other Interaction Type
Yes (inquirer of review of exile)

defensor (8/603)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 13.46-7 (CCSL 140A:1052-7).

Stephanus (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/590 to: --/--/603)
View Case

589/550 - ? (from: --/--/589 to: --/8/603)

Hispania [Spain]

unknown

Comitiolus

Interaction Date	589/90 (from: --/--/589 to: --/--/590)
Interaction Location	Hispania [Spain]
Office	magister militum per Spanias
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

magister militum per Spanias (589/90)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	8/603 (from: --/8/603 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (instigator of enquiry to review exile)

Bishop of Rome (8/603)

Iohannes (defensor)

Interaction Date	8/603 (from: --/8/603 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Hispania [Spain]
Office	defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support?

Other Interaction Type
Yes (inquirer of review of exile)

defensor (8/603)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 13.46 (CCSL 140A:1052-5).

Contumeliosus of Riez (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/534 to: --/--/535)
View Case

7/4/534 - ? (from: 7/4/534 to: --/--/--)

Reii [Riez]

unknown

Iohannes II of Rome

Interaction Date	7/4/534 (from: 7/4/534 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (7/4/534)

Agapitus of Rome

Interaction Date	before 18/7/535 (from: 18/7/535 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support?

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop of Rome (before 18/7/535)

Caesarius of Arles

Interaction Date	after 7/4/534 (from: 7/4/534 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (appointer of temporary successor)

Bishop (after 7/4/534)

Emeritus (defensor)

Interaction Date	after 7/4/534 (from: 7/4/534 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (enquirer of property questions)

defensor (after 7/4/534)

Epistolae Arelatenses 32-34, 37 (MGH Epp. 3:45-54, 56-57)

Alexander Acoemetes (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/420 to: --/--/430)
View Case

c. 420 - ? (from: --/--/420 to: --/--/--)

Chalcis ad Belum [Qinnasrin]

unknown

magister militum in Antioch

Interaction Date	c. 520 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Office	magister militum per orientem
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

magister militum per orientem (c. 520)

Theodotus of Antioch

Interaction Date	c. 420 (from: --/--/420 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (c. 420)

brethrens of Alexander Acoemetes

Interaction Date	c. 420 (from: --/--/420 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Monk
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	ascetic
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

Monk (c. 420)

municipal guards

Interaction Date	c. 420 (from: --/--/420 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Chalcis ad Belum [Qinnasrin]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Guard
Yes

(c. 420)

Vita Alexandri Acoemeti 41-2 (PO 6:690-91)

Gaianus of Alexandria (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/536)
View Case

536 - ? (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)

20 different prisons, including one in Antioch [n/a]

Carthago [Carthage]

unknown

Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Iustinianus

Interaction Date	536 (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (536)

Theodora (empress)

Interaction Date	536 (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Empress (536)

Theodosius of Alexandria

Interaction Date	536 (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop (536)

Narsis

Interaction Date	536 (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	cubicularius
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

cubicularius (536)

Gaianitians in Alexandria

Interaction Date	536 (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (demand return)

(536)

Dioscorus

Interaction Date	536 (from: --/--/536 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	praefectus augustalis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

praefectus augustalis (536)

Liberatus, Breviarium 20 (ACO 2.5:135) Historia patriarcharum Alexandrinorum 1.13 (PO 1:455-461) Victor of Tunnuna, chronica 540 (MGH AA 11:199)

Ibas of Edessa (male) mid fifth century, died 28/10/457 (from: --/--/431 to: 28/10/457)
View Case

449 - 451 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/451)

Edessa [Şanlıurfa]

yes

Flavius Thomas Iulianus Chaereas

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	comes ordinis primi et praeses Osrhoenae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

comes ordinis primi et praeses Osrhoenae (449)

Chrysaphius

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

(449)

Eutyches

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

(449)

Nonnus of Edessa

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Edessa [Şanlıurfa]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support?

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop (449)

ACO 2.1:376, 2.5:117; Sacrosancta Concilia (Labbe) 4:634, 891, 917; Chronica Edessena LXVIII; Barhadbessaba Arbaia (Nau, PO 9, Fasc. 5); Acta Synodis Ephesinae IIB (Akten der ephesinischen Synode vom Jahre 449) , ed. J. Flemming, Berlin 1917, p. 21-69

a priest at the church of Vibo Valentia (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/559 to: --/--/559)
View Case

2/559 - ? (from: --/2/559 to: --/--/--)

Vibo Valentia [Vibo Valentia]

unknown

Pelagius of Rome

Interaction Date	559 (from: --/--/559 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (559)

Rufinus of Vibo Valentia

Interaction Date	559 (from: --/--/559 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Vibo Valentia [Vibo Valentia]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (559)

Pelagius, epistula 34 (Gassò and Batlle: 93-95)

Paulinus of Forum Sempronii (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/559 to: --/--/559)
View Case

before 3/559 - ? (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)

Forum Sempronii [Fossombrone]

unknown

Pelagius of Rome

Interaction Date	2-3/559 (from: --/2/559 to: --/3/559)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (2-3/559)

Viator

Interaction Date	2-3/559 (from: --/2/559 to: --/3/559)
Interaction Location
Office	vir illustris
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

vir illustris (2-3/559)

Pancratius

Interaction Date	2-3/559 (from: --/2/559 to: --/3/559)
Interaction Location
Office	vir illustris
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

vir illustris (2-3/559)

Pelagius, epistula 35 (Gassò and Batlle: 96-101)

Micina (female) mid sixth century (from: --/--/559 to: --/--/559)
View Case

3/559 - ? (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)

Forum Sempronii [Fossombrone]

unknown

Pelagius of Rome

Interaction Date	3/559 (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (3/559)

Florentinus of Clusium

Interaction Date	3/559 (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Clusium [Chiusi]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (3/559)

Pelagius, epistula 47 (Gassò and Batlle: 127-8)

Paulus of Edessa (male) early sixth century, died 30/10/526 (from: --/--/510 to: 30/10/526)
View Case

7/522 - 3/526 (from: --/7/522 to: --/3/526)

Edessa [Şanlıurfa]

Euchaita [Beyözü]

yes

Asclepius of Edessa

Interaction Date	7/522 (from: --/7/522 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Edessa [Şanlıurfa]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop (7/522)

Iustinus

Interaction Date	522-526 (from: --/--/522 to: --/--/526)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes	Yes

Emperor (522-526)

Zacharias, historia ecclesiastica 8.4 (CSCO 84:75, 88:51) Chronicum Edessenum 89-92 (CSCO Scr. Syr. 3.4,1903: 9-10) https://archive.org/stream/chronicaminorapa00guid#page/8/mode/2up

Eusebius of Nicomedia (male) early fourth century, died 341 (from: --/--/330 to: --/--/341)
View Case

325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)

Nicomedia [İzmit]

Gaul [France]

yes

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes	Yes

Emperor (325/6 - c. 328)

Secundus of Ptolemais

Interaction Date	325 (from: --/--/325 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (prediction)

Bishop (325)

'principal bishops'

Interaction Date	c. 328 (from: --/--/328 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

Bishop (c. 328)

Theognis of Nicaea

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location	Gaul [France]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(325/6 - c. 328)

Constantia

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

(325/6 - c. 328)

Maris of Chalcedon

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location	Gaul [France]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(325/6 - c. 328)

Philostorgius, historia ecclesiastica 1.9-10, 2.7; Gelasius of Cyzicus, historia ecclesiastica I.11 (GCS NF 9:18-25); Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 1.19 (NPNF); Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 1.14 (NPNF); Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 2.16 (NPNF), 3.19.3; Opitz, Urkunde 27.16, 36 (Opitz, 125-6, 129);

Theognis of Nicaea (male) early fourth century (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/329)
View Case

325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)

Nicaea [Iznik]

Gaul [France]

yes

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes	Yes

Emperor (325/6 - c. 328)

Secundus of Ptolemais

Interaction Date	325 (from: --/--/325 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (prediction)

Bishop (325)

'principal bishops'

Interaction Date	c. 328 (from: --/--/328 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop (c. 328)

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes	Yes

Emperor (325/6 - c. 328)

Constantia

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

(325/6 - c. 328)

Maris of Chalcedon

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location	Gaul [France]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(325/6 - c. 328)

Eusebius of Nicomedia

Interaction Date	325/6 - c. 328 (from: --/--/326 to: --/--/328)
Interaction Location	Gaul [France]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(325/6 - c. 328)

Philostorgius, historia ecclesiastica 1.9, 2.7; Gelasius of Cyzicus, historia ecclesiastica I.11 (GCS NF 9:18-25); Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 1.19 (NPNF); Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 1.14 (NPNF); Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 2.16 (NPNF), 3.19.3; Opitz, Urkunde 27.16, 36 (Opitz, 125-6, 129);

Ursicinus of Rome (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/381)
View Case

11/366 - 9/367 (from: --/11/366 to: --/8/367)

yes

followers of Ursicinus

Interaction Date	366 - 9/367 (from: --/--/366 to: --/9/367)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(366 - 9/367)

Flavius Valentinianus

Interaction Date	366 - 9/367 (from: --/--/366 to: --/9/367)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

(366 - 9/367)

Vettius Agorius Praetextatus

Interaction Date	9/367 (from: --/9/367 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	praefectus urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support?

Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

praefectus urbis Romae (9/367)

Damasus

Interaction Date	11/366 (from: --/11/366 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop of Rome (11/366)

collectio Avellana 1.11, 5 (CSEL 35.1:4, 48) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/48/mode/2up Ammianus Marcellinus 27.3.12-13, 27.9.9 Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 2.23 (NPNF)

Ursicinus of Rome (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/381)
View Case

12/1/368 - ? (from: 12/1/368 to: --/--/--)

unknown

followers of Ursicinus

Interaction Date	12/1/368 - ? (from: 12/1/368 to: --/9/367)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(12/1/368 - ?)

Flavius Valentinianus

Interaction Date	12/1/368 (from: 12/1/368 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

(12/1/368)

Vettius Agorius Praetextatus

Interaction Date	12/1/368 (from: 12/1/368 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	praefectus urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

praefectus urbis Romae (12/1/368)

collectio Avellana 7 (CSEL 35.1:49-50) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/48/mode/2up Ammianus Marcellinus 27.9.9 Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 2.23 (NPNF)

Florentius of Epidaurum (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/592 to: --/--/592)
View Case

before 10/592 - after 12/597 (from: --/10/592 to: --/12/597)

Epidaurum [Cavtat]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	10/592 (from: --/10/592 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop of Rome (10/592)

Antoninus (subdiaconus)

Interaction Date	10/592 (from: --/10/592 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Dalmatia [Dalmatia]
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Subdeacon (10/592)

congregation of Epidaurum

Interaction Date	12/597 (from: --/12/597 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Epidaurum [Cavtat]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(12/597)

Natalis

Interaction Date	before 10/592 (from: --/10/592 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Salona [Solin]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (before 10/592)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 3.9-10, 8:11 (MGH Epp 1:169-70, 2:13-14) http://www.dmgh.de/de/fs1/object/goToPage/bsb00000535.html?pageNo=168&sortIndex=040%3A010%3A0001%3A010%3A00%3A00 http://www.dmgh.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb00000536_00058.html?sortIndex=040%3A010%3A0002%3A010%3A00%3A00&pageNo=14&zoom=1.00

presbyters and ministers of Carthage (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/440 to: --/--/440)
View Case

c. 440 - 474 (from: --/--/440 to: --/--/474)

Carthago [Carthage]

yes

Flavius Zenon

Interaction Date	474 (from: --/--/474 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Carthago [Carthage]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (474)

Severus

Interaction Date	474 (from: --/--/474 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Carthago [Carthage]
Office	patricius
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

patricius (474)

Geiseric

Interaction Date	440 (from: --/--/440 to: --/--/474)
Interaction Location
Office	King of the Vandals
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

King of the Vandals (440)

Victor of Vita, Historia persecutionis Africanae provinciae 1.51 (CSEL 7:22)

Arius (male) c. 250 - 336 (from: --/--/250 to: --/--/336)
View Case

19/6/325 - 327 (from: 19/6/325 to: --/--/327)

Illyricum [n/a]

yes

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	19/6/325 (from: 19/6/325 to: 19/6/325)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	327 (from: --/--/327 to: --/--/327)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (19/6/325)
Emperor (327)

Eusebius of Nicomedia

Interaction Date	327 (from: --/--/327 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (327)

Eusebius of Nicomedia

Interaction Date	327 (from: --/--/327 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (327)

'Arian' presbyter

Interaction Date	327 (from: --/--/327 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

presbyter (327)

Constantia

Interaction Date	327 (from: --/--/327 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Empress (327)

Euzoius (deacon)

Interaction Date	327 (from: --/--/327 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(327)

Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 1.8, 1.23-6 (NPNF) Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 1.21, 2.16 (NPNF)

Followers of Eunomius (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Flavius Arcadius

Interaction Date	21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (21 or 22/3/396)

Flavius Honorius

Interaction Date	21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (21 or 22/3/396)

Flavius Caesarius

Interaction Date	21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Orientis (21 or 22/3/396)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.31-32

Followers of Eunomius and Montanus (male) Date: Unknown
View Case

4/3/398 (from: 4/3/398 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Flavius Honorius

Interaction Date	4/3/398 (from: 4/3/398 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (4/3/398)

Flavius Eutychianus

Interaction Date	4/3/398 (from: 4/3/398 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Orientis (4/3/398)

Flavius Arcadius

Interaction Date	4/3/398 (from: 4/3/398 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (4/3/398)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.34

Arius (male) c. 250 - 336 (from: --/--/250 to: --/--/336)
View Case

333-335 (from: --/--/333 to: --/--/335)

North Africa [North Africa]

yes

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	333 (from: --/--/333 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (333)

Paterius

Interaction Date	333 (from: --/--/333 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	praefectus Aegypti
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

praefectus Aegypti (333)

Opitz, Urkunde 33/28, 34/27 See T. Barnes, 'The Exiles and Recalls of Arius', Journal of Theological Studies 60 (2009), 109-129

Donatists (male) Date: Unknown
View Case

314/15? - 321 (from: --/--/315 to: --/--/321)

yes

Locrius Verinus

Interaction Date	321 (from: --/--/321 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	vicarius Africae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

vicarius Africae (321)

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	314/5? - 321 (from: --/--/315 to: --/--/321)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

Emperor (314/5? - 321)

Augustinus, contra Donatistas 31.54 (CSEL 53:154) Augustinus, Breuiculus collationis cum Donatistis 3.40 (CCSL 149A) Augustinus, Psalmus contra partem Donati 54 (Anastasi, Padua 1957)

Eunomians, Arians, Macedonians, Apollinarians and other sects (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

3/12/383 - ? (from: 3/12/383 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Flavius Gratianus

Interaction Date	3/12/383 (from: 3/12/383 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (3/12/383)

Flavius Valentinianus

Interaction Date	3/12/383 (from: 3/12/383 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (3/12/383)

Flavius Theodosius

Interaction Date	3/12/383 (from: 3/12/383 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (3/12/383)

Postumianus

Interaction Date	3/12/383 (from: 3/12/383 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Orientis (3/12/383)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.12

Donatist clerics and ministers (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

30/1/412 - ? (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)

Africa [n/a]

unknown

Flavius Honorius

Interaction Date	30/1/412 (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/1/412)

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	30/1/412 (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/1/412)

Seleucus

Interaction Date	30/1/412 (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Africae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Africae (30/1/412)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.52.5

Manichaeans and Donatists (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

30/5/428 - ? (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	30/5/428 (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/5/428)

Valentinianus III

Interaction Date	30/5/428 (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/5/428)

Flavius Florentius

Interaction Date	30/5/428 (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Orientis (30/5/428)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.65.2-3

Claudianus (Donatist bishop) (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/375 to: --/--/375)
View Case

before 378/9 - ? (from: --/--/379 to: --/--/--)

Africa [n/a]

unknown

Flavius Gratianus

Interaction Date	378/9 and before (from: --/--/379 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (restrict teaching)

Emperor (378/9 and before)

Flavius Valentinianus

Interaction Date	378/9 and before (from: --/--/379 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (restrict teaching)

Emperor (378/9 and before)

Aquilinus (vicarius)

Interaction Date	378/9 and before (from: --/--/379 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	vicarius urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (restrict teaching)

vicarius urbis Romae (378/9 and before)

Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, edited Mansi, vol. 3:628 http://www.fscire.it/it/mansi/immagine/1472/#di-comboopere

Liberius of Rome (male) died 366 (from: --/--/336 to: --/--/366)
View Case

356-358 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/358)

Phrygia [Central Anatolia]

Beroe [Stara Zagora]

yes

Liberius' brothers, the presbyters and fellow bishops of the east

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

(357)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	355/6 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes	Yes (money, )

Interaction Date	358 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict?

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Emperor (355/6)
Emperor (358)
Emperor (357)
Emperor (357)

Fortunatianus of Aquileia

Interaction Date	before 354 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/354)
Interaction Location	Ticinum [Pavia]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/358)
Interaction Location	Aquileia [Aquileia]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent
Yes (writer of letter)

Bishop (before 354)
Bishop (357)

Ursacius of Singidunum

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Singidunum [Belgrade]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (357)
Bishop (357)

Valens of Mursa

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mursa [Osijek]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (357)
Bishop (357)

Germinius of Sirmium

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (357)
Bishop (357)

Felix

Interaction Date	autumn 356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Archdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Archdeacon (autumn 356)

Epictetus

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Centumcellae [Civitavecchia]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop (356)
Bishop (357)

Auxentius of Milan

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/12/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop (356)
Bishop (357)

Vincentius

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Capua [Santa Maria Capua Vetere]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

Bishop (357)

Caecilianus

Interaction Date	before 356 (from: --/--/353 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location	Spoletium [Spoleto]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Bishop (before 356)

Urbicus

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/357)
Interaction Location	Beroe [Stara Zagora]
Office	Deacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

Deacon (357)

Venerius

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Beroe [Stara Zagora]
Office	agens in rebus
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Guard
Yes

agens in rebus (357)

Eusebius of Vercelli

Interaction Date	353/3 (from: --/--/353 to: --/--/354)
Interaction Location	Vercellae [Vercelli]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Interaction Date	355-356 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location	Scythopolis/Nysa [Beit She'an]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Bishop (353/3)
(355-356)

Lucifer of Cagliari

Interaction Date	354 (from: --/--/354 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Calaris [Cagliari]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Interaction Date	355-6 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location	Germanikeia [Kahramanmaraş]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Nicaean
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Bishop (354)
(355-6)

Dionysius of Milan

Interaction Date	355-356 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location	Armenia [Armenia]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

(355-356)

Demophilus of Constantinople

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (joint attendant of council)

Bishop (357)

Hilarius

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	cubicularius
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

cubicularius (357)

All the bishops of Campania

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Campania [Campania]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop (357)

People of Rome

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

(356)

Deputation from the Western Bishops

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Bishop (357)

Deputies of the Eastern bishops and of other priests

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance, support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

(357)

Athanasius

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Nicaean
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (357)

Crescens

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/758 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

presbyter (357)

Eusebia (Empress)

Interaction Date	355/6 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict?

Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes (money, )

Empress (355/6)

Eusebius (eunuch)

Interaction Date	355/6 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/356)
Interaction Location
Office	praepositus sacri cubiculi
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes	Yes (money, )

praepositus sacri cubiculi (355/6)

Noblewomen of Rome

Interaction Date	357/8 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

(357/8)

Damasus

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/357)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Deacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

Deacon (356)

Catulinus

Interaction Date	358 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	agens in rebus
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Messenger
Yes

agens in rebus (358)

Constantina

Interaction Date	358 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	cymiterium sanctae Agnes [Sant'Agnese fuori le mura/Santa Costanza]
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Host	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

Empress (358)

Osius of Cordoba

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of Council)

(357)

Hilarius of Poitiers

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop (356)

Rhodanius of Toulouse

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Tolosa [Toulouse]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop (356)

ICUR, NS 9, 24831 Hilarius of Poitiers, coll. Antiar. Paris., B VII (CSEL 65:164-73) Eusebius of Vercelli, epistula 2.4.2 (CCSL 9:106) Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 4.11 and 15 (NPNF) Theoderetus, historia ecclesiastica 2.17 (SC 501:412). Ammianus Marcellinus 15.7.6-10 Gesta inter Liberium et Felicem, collectio Avellana 1-3 (CSEL 35.1:1-2) Rufinus, historia ecclesiastica 10.23 and 28 (Mommsen, 988 and 990-91) Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.37.91-4 Liberius, epistula 3.1 (CCSL 9:123) Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 97 (TU 14.1:47) Athanasius, historia Arianorum 36-41 (Opitz 2.1:203-6) Athanasius, apologia contra Arianos 89 Liber Pontificalis 37 (MGH Gesta pontificum Romanorum 1:77-9) CLE 00787 = ICUR-09, 24831 (p 389) = ILCV 00967 (em) = AE 2007, +00127 Philostorgius, historia ecclesiastica 4.3

Hilarius (male) mid fourth century (from: --/--/354 to: --/--/377)
View Case

355-358 or 360/61 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/360)

Mediolan(i)um [Milan]

unknown [unknown]

yes

Eusebius of Vercelli

Interaction Date	355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (355)

Lucifer of Cagliari

Interaction Date	355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (355)

Dionysius of Milan

Interaction Date	355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (355)

Pancratius

Interaction Date	355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

presbyter (355)

Valens of Mursa

Interaction Date	355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (355)

Ursacius of Singidunum

Interaction Date	355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (355)

Heraclianus

Interaction Date	before 13/1/366 (from: 13/1/366 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Receiver of benefaction from exile
Yes (conversion, )

(before 13/1/366)

Hilarius of Poitiers, ad Constantium 1.7 (PL 10:562B) Lucifer, Pancratius et Hilarius, epistula, in Eusebius of Vercelli, Appendix II.A.2 (CCSL 9:120) Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 95 (TU 14.1:46) Lucifer of Cagliari, de regibus apostaticis 5 (CCSL 8:145) Athanasius, historia Arianorum 41.1-2 (Opitz II.1:206) Hieronymus, chronica, ann. 355 (GCS 47:240) Prosper of Aquitaine, chronica, ann. 354 (MGH auct. ant. 9, chronica minora 1:455)

Rhodanius of Toulouse (male) mid fourth century, died before 360 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/360)
View Case

Probably after the council of Béziers in 356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)

Tolosa [Toulouse]

Liberius of Rome

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop (356)

Hilarius of Poitiers

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop (356)

Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 4.9.3 (SC 418:220); Rufinus, historia ecclesiastica 10.20-21 (GCS 9.2:987-8); Hieronymus, Chronica, ann. 354 (Jeanjean-Lancon, 90); Prosper of Aquitaine, Chronica 1090 (ann. 354) (MGH auct. ant. 9:455); Sulpicius Severus, Chronica 2.39.4 and 2.45.4 (SC 441:314, 332); Faustinus et Marcellinus, libellus precum 24 (SC 504:130); Hilarius of Potiers, in Constantium 11 (SC 334:190)

Aetius of Antioch (male) mid fourth century, died 367 (from: --/--/344 to: --/--/367)
View Case

358 or 359 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/362)

Constantinopolis [Istanbul]

Pepouza [unknown]

yes

Basilius of Ancyra

Interaction Date	358 or 359 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/359)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	359 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (358 or 359)
Bishop (359)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	358 or 359 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/359)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	359 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes

Emperor (358 or 359)
Emperor (359)
Emperor (between 360 and 362)

Acacius of Caesarea

Interaction Date	359 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes

Bishop (359)
Bishop (between 360 and 362)

Eunomius of Cyzikus

Interaction Date	between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (attempted to return exile)

Bishop (between 360 and 362)

People of Amblada

Interaction Date	between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Receiver of benefaction from exile
Yes (preaching, )

(between 360 and 362)

Philostorgius, historia ecclesiastica 4.8, 11-12; 5.1-2; 6.7 (GCS) Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 2.23 (PG 1038-9)

Irenaeus (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/431 to: --/--/448)
View Case

435 - before 445 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/445)

Petra [Petra]

yes

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	435 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (435)

Photius

Interaction Date	435 - before 445 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/445)
Interaction Location	Petra [Petra]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support?

Companion
Yes

(435 - before 445)

Flavius Anthemius Isidorus

Interaction Date	435 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	praefectus urbis Constantinopolitanae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

praefectus urbis Constantinopolitanae (435)

ACO I.4:203 nos. 277-8

Deacon sent by Damasus of Rome (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373)
View Case

c. 373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373)

Phaino [Wadi Faynan]

unknown

Aelius Palladius

Interaction Date	c. 373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	praefectus Aegypti
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

praefectus Aegypti (c. 373)

Monks of Alexandria

Interaction Date	c. 373 - ? (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Phaino [Wadi Faynan]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(c. 373 - ?)

Damasus

Interaction Date	c. 373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Messenger
Yes

Bishop of Rome (c. 373)

Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 4.26 (GCS 44:258)

Lucius of Alexandria (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/363 to: --/--/380)
View Case

373 - ? (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Flavius Valens

Interaction Date	373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (373)

Officer of Valens

Interaction Date	373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

(373)

Aelius Palladius

Interaction Date	after 373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(after 373)

Severus of Hermopolis, historia Patriarcharum Alexandrinorum 2.9 (translated by Evetts) http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/severus_hermopolis_hist_alex_patr_02_part2.htm#PETER_II

Hilarus (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/600 to: --/--/601)
View Case

10/7/601 - ? (from: 10/7/601 to: --/--/--)

Neapolis [Naples]

unknown

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	10/7/601 (from: 10/7/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (10/7/601)

Iohannes

Interaction Date	7/600 (from: --/7/600 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Deacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (accusation)

Deacon (7/600)

Anthemius

Interaction Date	10/7/601 (from: 10/7/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Campania [Campania]
Office	Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Subdeacon (10/7/601)

Gregorius Magnus, epistula 11.53 (CCSL 140A:956-7)

Eulalius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/418 to: --/--/423)
View Case

29/3/419 - 423 (from: 29/3/419 to: --/--/423)

Campania [Campania]

collectio Avellana 31-7 (CSEL 35.1:77-84) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/76/mode/2up Liber Pontificalis 44 (Duchesne I:89-92) https://archive.org/stream/bookofpopesliber00loom#page/88/mode/2up

Pelagius (male) c. 350 - 420 (from: --/--/350 to: --/--/420)
View Case

13/4/418 - ? (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)

Flavius Honorius

Interaction Date	13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (13/4/418)

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (13/4/418)

Caelestius

Interaction Date	13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	ascetic
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (joint exile)

(13/4/418)

Codex canonum (PL 56:490-93) https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=R19EImjpsB0C&pg=PT229#v=onepage&q&f=false

Caelestius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/390 to: --/--/431)
View Case

13/4/418 - ? (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)