Aetius of Antioch (male) mid fourth century, died 367 (from: --/--/344 to: --/--/367) View Case
358 or 359 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/362)
Alexandria [Alexandria]
Pepouza [unknown]
yes
Basilius of Ancyra
Interactions
Interaction Date
358 or 359 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/359)
Interaction Location
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
359 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Bishop (358 or 359)
Bishop (359)
Constantius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
358 or 359 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/359)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
359 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Emperor (358 or 359)
Emperor (359)
Emperor (between 360 and 362)
Acacius of Caesarea
Interactions
Interaction Date
359 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Bishop (359)
Bishop (between 360 and 362)
Eunomius of Cyzikus
Interactions
Interaction Date
between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (attempted to return exile)
Bishop (between 360 and 362)
People of Amblada
Interactions
Interaction Date
between 360 and 362 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support
Receiver of benefaction from exile
Yes (preaching, )
Philostorgius, historia ecclesiastica 4.8, 11-12; 5.1-2; 6.7 (GCS)
Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 2.23 (PG 1038-9)
Eunomius of Cyzikus (male) mid fourth century, died c. 395 (from: --/--/335 to: --/--/395) View Case
358-360 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/360)
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Midaion [Karahöyük]
n/a
Basilius of Ancyra
Interactions
Interaction Date
358 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Constantius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
358 (from: --/--/358 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Maris of Chalcedon
Interactions
Interaction Date
(from: --/--/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (consecrated Eunomius as bishop)
Eudoxius of Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
359 (from: --/--/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (consecrated Eunomius as bishop)
Aetius of Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
359 (from: --/--/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (requests return of Aetius from exile)
Philostorgius, historia ecclesiastica 4.5, 4.8
Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 2.27, p. 160-61
Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 4.13.5-6, p. 156
Gregory of Nyssa, contra Eunomium
Followers of Eunomius (unknown) Date: Unknown View Case
21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: --/--/--)
unknown
Flavius Arcadius
Interactions
Interaction Date
21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Flavius Caesarius
Interactions
Interaction Date
21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Office
PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
PPO Orientis (21 or 22/3/396)
Codex Theodosianus 16.5.31-32
Donatists (male) Date: Unknown View Case
c. 317 - ? (from: --/--/317 to: --/--/--)
Africa [n/a]
unknown
Flavius Valerius Constantinus
Interactions
Interaction Date
c. 317 (from: --/--/317 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Flavius Valerius Constantinus
Interactions
Interaction Date
after 317 (from: --/--/317 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Optatus 2.15.4 (SC 412)
Augustinus, epistula 141.9 (CSEL 44:243)
Hilarius (male) mid fourth century (from: --/--/354 to: --/--/377) View Case
355-358 or 360/61 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/360)
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
unknown [unknown]
yes
Eusebius of Vercelli
Interactions
Interaction Date
355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Lucifer of Cagliari
Interactions
Interaction Date
355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Dionysius of Milan
Interactions
Interaction Date
355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Pancratius
Interactions
Interaction Date
355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Valens of Mursa
Interactions
Interaction Date
355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Ursacius of Singidunum
Interactions
Interaction Date
355 (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Heraclianus
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 13/1/366 (from: 13/1/366 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Receiver of benefaction from exile
Yes (conversion, )
Hilarius of Poitiers, ad Constantium 1.7 (PL 10:562B)
Lucifer, Pancratius et Hilarius, epistula, in Eusebius of Vercelli, Appendix II.A.2 (CCSL 9:120)
Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 95 (TU 14.1:46)
Lucifer of Cagliari, de regibus apostaticis 5 (CCSL 8:145)
Athanasius, historia Arianorum 41.1-2 (Opitz II.1:206)
Hieronymus, chronica, ann. 355 (GCS 47:240)
Prosper of Aquitaine, chronica, ann. 354 (MGH auct. ant. 9, chronica minora 1:455)
Opilio (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591) View Case
8/591 - ? (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Church of Venafrum in Campania [Venafro]
unknown
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Anthemius
Interactions
Interaction Date
8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.66 (CCSL 140:76)
Servus Dei (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591) View Case
8/591 - ? (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Church of Venafrum in Campania [Venafro]
unknown
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Anthemius
Interactions
Interaction Date
8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.66 (CCSL 140:76)
Crescentius (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591) View Case
8/591 - ? (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Church of Venafrum in Campania [Venafro]
unknown
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Anthemius
Interactions
Interaction Date
8/591 (from: --/8/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.66 (CCSL 140:76)
Sabinianus (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/415 to: --/--/415) View Case
early fifth century (from: --/--/415 to: --/--/--)
Roma [Rome]
Bethlehem [Bethlehem]
unknown
Hieronymus
Interactions
Interaction Date
early fifth century (from: --/--/415 to: --/--/415)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict?
nun in Bethlehem
Interactions
Interaction Date
early fifth century (from: --/--/415 to: --/--/415)
Interaction Location
Bethlehem [Bethlehem]
Office
Nun
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
ascetic
Relationship Quality
support?
Other Interaction Type
Yes (adultery)
Nun (early fifth century)
Hieronymus, epistula 147.11 (Labourt 8: 131)
Honorata (female) late sixth century (from: --/--/594 to: --/--/594) View Case
? - 7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/7/594)
Sicilia [Sicily]
yes
Leo of Catania
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Catina [Catania]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
Husband of Honorata
Interactions
Interaction Date
7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
kinship
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Honorata returned to husband)
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 4.34 (CCSL 140:254)
Lapsed priests, deacons or other clergy (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/591 to: --/--/591) View Case
5/591 - ? (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Sicilia [Sicily]
Sicilia [Sicily]
unknown
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
5/591 (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Petrus
Interactions
Interaction Date
5/591 (from: --/5/591 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Sicilia [Sicily]
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.42 (CCSL 140:54)
clerics of Ravenna (male) around 600 (from: --/--/601 to: --/--/601) View Case
before 2/601 - ? (from: --/2/601 to: --/2/601)
Ravenna [Ravenna]
Sicilia [Sicily]
unknown
Iohannes of Ravenna
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 2/601 (from: --/2/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Ravenna [Ravenna]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Romanus of Sicily
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 2/601 (from: --/2/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Sicilia [Sicily]
Office
defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
2/601 (from: --/2/601 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 11.24 (CCSL 140A:894-5).
Romanus (cleric at the church of Teano) (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/559 to: --/--/559) View Case
3/559 - ? (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)
Teanum Sidicinum [Teano (Caserta)]
unknown
Pelagius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/559 (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Constantinus (defensor)
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/599 (from: --/3/559 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
defensor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Pelagius, epistula 54 (Gassò and Batlle: 143-4)