Search Results

Here you will find brief information about all exile cases relating to the category/ies you searched for, listed by the person/group exiled in alphabetical order. Click on 'View Case' to research each record further.

Exile Cases

Exile

Exile Date

Sent From

Went To

Returned

Relationships

Office

Sources

Athanasius (male) (from: --/--/296 to: 2/5/373)
View Case

9/335 - 23/11/337 (from: 17/9/335 to: 23/11/337)

Tyrus [Tyre]

Col. Augusta Treverorum [Trier]

yes

Alexander

Interaction Date	337 (from: --/--/337 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (337)

Severianus

Interaction Date	337 (from: --/--/337 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (337)

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	11/335 (from: 6/11/335 to: 7/11/335)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to
Yes	Yes

Emperor (11/335)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	337 (from: --/--/337 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (337)

Flavius Iulius Constans

Interaction Date	335 (from: --/--/335 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict?

Correspondent
Yes (writer of letter)

Emperor (335)

Athanasius, apologia secunda 9.1-5, 71ff. Athanasius, epistula festalis 10

Hilarius of Poitiers (male) c. 315 - 368 (from: --/--/315 to: --/--/368)
View Case

356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)

Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]

Phrygia [Central Anatolia]

yes

Liberius of Rome

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop of Rome (356)

Rhodanius of Toulouse

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Tolosa [Toulouse]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop (356)

Valens of Mursa

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mursa [Osijek]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)

Bishop (356)

Ursacius of Singidunum

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Singidunum [Belgrade]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)

Bishop (356)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes	Yes

Emperor (356)
Emperor (after September 359)

Bishops of Gaul

Interaction Date	356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Gallia [France]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Bishop (356-360)

Priests in Poitiers

Interaction Date	356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office	presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter, writer of letter)

presbyter (356-360)

Abra of Poitiers

Interaction Date	356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office	Nun
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	kinship

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Nun (356-360)

160 Eastern bishops

Interaction Date	September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (September 359)

Ten Nicaean and ten 'heretical' bishops

Interaction Date	after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint delegates to Constantinople)

Bishop (after September 359)

Saturninus of Arles

Interaction Date	360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (excommunicated with help of exile)

Bishop (360)
Bishop (360)

Martinus of Tours

Interaction Date	360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Visitor
Yes

(360)

Hilarius of Poitiers, liber contra Auxentium 7 (PL 10:614); Hilarius of Poitiers, ad Constantium 2.1-2 (CSEL 65:197-8); Hilarius of Poitiers, in Constantium 2 and 12-15 (SC 334:170 and 192-8); Hilarius of Poitiers, de synodis 1-2, 8 and 63 (PL 10:479-81, 485 and 522-3); Hilarius of Poitiers, de trinitate 1-3, 4.1 and 10.4 (SC 443:202-386, SC 448:12 and SC 462:178); Hilarius of Poitiers, Fragmentum historiarum A.5-9, B.3.2, B.7.1-2, B.7.5-11 and B.8.1-2 (CSEL 65:78-97, 155-6, 164-73 and 174-7); Venantius Fortunatus, vita s. Hilarii 6 (MGH auct. ant. 4.2:3); Hieronymus, chronica, ann. 356 (Jeanjean-Lancon, 92); Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 100 (Ceresa-Gastaldo, 204); Hieronymus, altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi 19 (CCSL 79B:48-9); Faustinus et Marcellinus, libellus precum 24 (SC 504:130); Prosper of Aquitaine, chronica 1096 (ann. 356) (MGH auct. ant. 9:455); Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 3.14.41, 4.12.6 and 4.22 (SC 418:138, 242 and 300-312); Sulpicius Severus, chronica 2.42 and 2.45.2-3 (SC 441:322 and 330); Sulpicius Severus, vita Martini 6.7 and 7.1 (SC 133:266); Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.39-40 (SC 493:200-216); Epistula ab episcopis Gallicanis ad orientales episcopos 1-4 (CCSL 148:33-4);

Eulogius (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373)
View Case

373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)

Edessa [Şanlıurfa]

Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]

yes

Flavius Valens

Interaction Date	373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (373)

Protogenes

Interaction Date	373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location	Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(373 - before 379)

bishop of Antinoopolis

Interaction Date	373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location	Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Host
Yes

Bishop (373 - before 379)

Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 4.18 (SC 530:248)

Protogenes (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373)
View Case

373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)

Edessa [Şanlıurfa]

Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]

yes

Flavius Valens

Interaction Date	373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (373)

bishop of Antinoopolis

Interaction Date	373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location	Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Host
Yes

Bishop (373 - before 379)

boys in Antinoopolis

Interaction Date	(from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support?

Other Interaction Type
Yes (boys receive exorcism, forced to conversion by parents)

Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 4.18 (SC 530:248)

Stephanus of Cyprus (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/565 to: --/--/565)
View Case

c. 565 - before 577 (from: --/--/565 to: --/--/577)

Cyprus [Cyprus]

Plataea [Platees]

yes

clerics and lifeguardsmen from Constantinople

Interaction Date	c. 565 (from: --/--/565 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Plataea [Platees]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Military Escort	Visitor	Other Interaction Type	Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes	Yes	Yes (abuser of exile)	Yes (conversion, )

(c. 565)

Ioannes of Constantinople (sixth c.)

Interaction Date	c. 565 (from: --/--/565 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Responsible for moving exile to a different location	Responsible for return	Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes (conversion, )

(c. 565)

Iustinus II

Interaction Date	between 565 and 577 (from: --/--/565 to: --/--/577)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes	Yes

Emperor (between 565 and 577)

Aelia Sophia

Interaction Date	(from: --/--/571 to: --/--/572)
Interaction Location	Imperial palace of Constantinople [Palace of Constantinople]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes

Ioannes of Ephesus, historia ecclesiastica 1.16, 2.3 (NPNF)

Athanasius (male) (from: --/--/296 to: 2/5/373)
View Case

357 - 21/2/362 (from: --/--/357 to: 21/2/362)

Alexandria [Alexandria]

Aegyptus [Egypt]

yes

George of Cappadocia

Interaction Date	24/2/357 (from: 24/2/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop (24/2/357)

Monks in Egypt

Interaction Date	357 - 362 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/362)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	Monk
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	ascetic
Relationship Quality	support

Host
Yes

Monk (357 - 362)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes	Yes (receiver of letter)	Yes

Emperor (357)

Servatius of Tongern

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Bishop (c. 357)

Clementius

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Valens

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Flavius Felicissimus

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Rufinus

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Stephanus

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Asterius

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Palladius

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Antiochus

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Euagrius

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Person/group appealed to
Yes

(c. 357)

Gerontius

Interaction Date	19/2/362 (from: 19/2/362 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	praefectus Aegypti
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

praefectus Aegypti (19/2/362)

Pythiodorus

Interaction Date	362 (from: --/--/362 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

(362)

Eudaimonis

Interaction Date	c. 357 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	ascetic
Relationship Quality	support

Host
Yes

(c. 357)

Gregorius of Nazianzus, oratio 21.20 Athanasius, apologia ad Constantium 29.3 Athanasius, historia Arianorum 53ff. Ammianus Marcellinus 22.5.3 Historia Acephala 4.1-4 Palladius, historia Lausiaca 63 Festal Index 28, 30, 32 (SC 317: 257-61) Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 5.6

Flavius Ioannes ('the Cappadocian') (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/520 to: --/--/548)
View Case

c. 541 - 548 (from: --/--/541 to: --/--/548)

Cyzikus [Erdek/Bandirma]

Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]

yes

Theodora (empress)

Interaction Date	c. 541 (from: --/--/541 to: --/--/541)
Interaction Location
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Empress (c. 541)

Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Iustinianus

Interaction Date	548 (from: --/--/548 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support?

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (548)

Procopius, bellum Persarum 1.25.39-43, 2.30.49-50; Malalas, chronica 480, fr. 47; Procopius, anecdota 17.40-44, 21.5; Marcellinus Comes, additamenta ad chronicon a. 544

Andreas (male) late sixth century (from: --/--/571 to: --/--/571)
View Case

after 571 - before 577 (from: --/--/571 to: --/--/577)

City wall of Constantinople [Theodosian wall]

Monastery of Acoemetae [n/a]

yes

Ioannes of Constantinople (sixth c.)

Interaction Date	after 571 (from: --/--/571 to: --/--/577)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (after 571)

Iustinus II

Interaction Date	between 571 and 577 (from: --/--/571 to: --/--/577)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (between 571 and 577)

Band of clergy and Romans

Interaction Date	after 571 (from: --/--/571 to: --/--/577)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Military Escort
Yes

(after 571)

Crowd in Constantinople

Interaction Date	after 571 (from: --/--/571 to: --/--/577)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (rescue from arrest)

(after 571)

Ioannes of Ephesus, historia ecclesiastica 2.14

Pelagius of Rome (male) died 4/3/561 (from: --/--/536 to: 4/3/561)
View Case

554 - before 556 (from: --/--/554 to: --/--/556)

Constantinopolis [Istanbul]

yes

Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Iustinianus

Interaction Date	554 (from: --/--/554 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (554)

Pelagius, epistula 80.2 (Gassò and Batlle: 197) Pelagius, In defensione trium capitulorum 4 and 6 (Studi e Testi 57: 32, 67, 68).

Anastasius of Antioch (male) late sixth century, died 599 (from: --/--/561 to: --/--/599)
View Case

570 - 593 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/593)

Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]

yes

Iustinus II

Interaction Date	570 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (570)

Gregorius of Antioch

Interaction Date	570 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Ierusalem [Jerusalem]
Office	Monk
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Monk (570)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	between 570 and 593 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/593)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent	Responsible for return
Yes (writer of letter)	Yes

Bishop of Rome (between 570 and 593)

Flavius Mauricius Tiberius

Interaction Date	593 (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (593)

Theodosius (son of Maurice)

Interaction Date	593 (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (593)

Theophanes, AM 6062, 6087 (de Boor, 243, 272) Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.7, 25, 26, 28; 5.39; 7,27, 33; 8.2 (CCSL 140)

Refine Results

Gender
- - Male (10)
Only threatend with exile
- - No (10)
Refuge from judicial proceedings
- - No (9)
  - Yes (1)
Exile as a result of asylum
- - No (9)
  - Yes (1)
Offences
more
Legal type of exile
Additional punishment
Deposed by synod?
- - No (9)
  - Yes (1)
Returned by synod?
- - No (9)
  - Unknown (1)
Synod of deposition or return
- - First Synod Of Tyre (1)
Returned?
Reason for return
more
Intended duration
- - Permanent (7)
  - Unknown (3)
Actual duration
more
Location of departure
more
Location of destination
more
Location of arrival
more
Type of location of arrival
more
Location of return
more
Religious status before exile
- - Clerical (10)
Religious status after exile
- - Clerical (9)
  - Unknown (1)
Office before exile
Office during exile
- - N/a (9)
  - Bishop (1)
Office after exile
Enforced rank change?
- - No (1)
Religious affiliation before exile
- - Non-Chalcedonian (1)
Religious affiliation during exile
- - Non-Chalcedonian (1)
Religious affiliation after exile
- - Chalcedonian (1)
  - Nicaean (1)
Circumstances of leaving
- - Placed On A Board Of A Ship, With Nothing But One Cheap Cloak (1)
Reason for leaving place of exile
more
Writings in exile?
- - Unknown (7)
  - Yes (3)
Activities related to doctrine
more
Related people
more
Death in exile?
- - No (10)
Venerated?
- - Yes (6)
  - No (4)
Exile start date (most numerous first)
more
- - 373 (2)
  - 335 (1)
  - 356 (1)
  - 357 (1)
  - 541 (1)
Exile end date (most numerous first)
more
- - 379 (2)
  - 577 (2)
  - 337 (1)
  - 360 (1)
  - 362 (1)
Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group
more

Search Results

Exile Cases

Refine Results

Gender

Only threatend with exile

Refuge from judicial proceedings

Exile as a result of asylum

Offences

Legal type of exile

Additional punishment

Deposed by synod?

Returned by synod?

Synod of deposition or return

Returned?

Reason for return

Intended duration

Actual duration

Location of departure

Location of destination

Location of arrival

Type of location of arrival

Location of return

Religious status before exile

Religious status after exile

Office before exile

Office during exile

Office after exile

Enforced rank change?

Religious affiliation before exile

Religious affiliation during exile

Religious affiliation after exile

Circumstances of leaving

Reason for leaving place of exile

Writings in exile?

Activities related to doctrine

Related people

Death in exile?

Venerated?

Exile start date (most numerous first)

Exile end date (most numerous first)

Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group