Hilarius of Poitiers (male) c. 315 - 368 (from: --/--/315 to: --/--/368) View Case
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Phrygia [Central Anatolia]
yes
Liberius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)
Rhodanius of Toulouse
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Tolosa [Toulouse]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)
Valens of Mursa
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mursa [Osijek]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)
Ursacius of Singidunum
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Singidunum [Belgrade]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)
Constantius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Correspondent
Person/group appealed to
Yes
Yes
Emperor (356)
Emperor (after September 359)
Bishops of Gaul
Interactions
Interaction Date
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Gallia [France]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)
Priests in Poitiers
Interactions
Interaction Date
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office
presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter, writer of letter)
Abra of Poitiers
Interactions
Interaction Date
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office
Nun
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
kinship
Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)
160 Eastern bishops
Interactions
Interaction Date
September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Ten Nicaean and ten 'heretical' bishops
Interactions
Interaction Date
after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint delegates to Constantinople)
Bishop (after September 359)
Saturninus of Arles
Interactions
Interaction Date
360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (excommunicated with help of exile)
Bishop (360)
Bishop (360)
Martinus of Tours
Interactions
Interaction Date
360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Hilarius of Poitiers, liber contra Auxentium 7 (PL 10:614);
Hilarius of Poitiers, ad Constantium 2.1-2 (CSEL 65:197-8);
Hilarius of Poitiers, in Constantium 2 and 12-15 (SC 334:170 and 192-8);
Hilarius of Poitiers, de synodis 1-2, 8 and 63 (PL 10:479-81, 485 and 522-3);
Hilarius of Poitiers, de trinitate 1-3, 4.1 and 10.4 (SC 443:202-386, SC 448:12 and SC 462:178);
Hilarius of Poitiers, Fragmentum historiarum A.5-9, B.3.2, B.7.1-2, B.7.5-11 and B.8.1-2 (CSEL 65:78-97, 155-6, 164-73 and 174-7);
Venantius Fortunatus, vita s. Hilarii 6 (MGH auct. ant. 4.2:3);
Hieronymus, chronica, ann. 356 (Jeanjean-Lancon, 92);
Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 100 (Ceresa-Gastaldo, 204);
Hieronymus, altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi 19 (CCSL 79B:48-9);
Faustinus et Marcellinus, libellus precum 24 (SC 504:130);
Prosper of Aquitaine, chronica 1096 (ann. 356) (MGH auct. ant. 9:455);
Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 3.14.41, 4.12.6 and 4.22 (SC 418:138, 242 and 300-312);
Sulpicius Severus, chronica 2.42 and 2.45.2-3 (SC 441:322 and 330);
Sulpicius Severus, vita Martini 6.7 and 7.1 (SC 133:266);
Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.39-40 (SC 493:200-216);
Epistula ab episcopis Gallicanis ad orientales episcopos 1-4 (CCSL 148:33-4);
Honorata (female) late sixth century (from: --/--/594 to: --/--/594) View Case
? - 7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/7/594)
Sicilia [Sicily]
yes
Leo of Catania
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Catina [Catania]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
Husband of Honorata
Interactions
Interaction Date
7/594 (from: --/7/594 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
kinship
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Honorata returned to husband)
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 4.34 (CCSL 140:254)
Silverius of Rome (male) mid sixth century, died 2/12/537 (from: --/--/536 to: 2/12/537) View Case
3/537 - 2/12/537 (from: --/3/537 to: 2/12/537)
Roma [Rome]
Patara [GelemiÅŸ]
no
Vigilius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/537)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Successor in post
Yes
Yes
Yes
Flavius Belisarius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
magister militum per orientem
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
magister militum per orientem (3/537)
Iohannis, subdiaconus regionarius primae regionis
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support?
Responsible for rank change
Yes
Antonina
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
patricia
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for rank change
Yes
Yes
Xystus, subdiaconus regionarius regionis sextae
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict?
multitude in Palmaria
Interactions
Interaction Date
12/537 (from: --/12/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Palmaria insula [Palmarola]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
Bishop of Patara
Interactions
Interaction Date
537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/537)
Interaction Location
Patara [GelemiÅŸ]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Pelagius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/537)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Theodora (empress)
Interactions
Interaction Date
(from: --/3/537 to: --/3/537)
Interaction Location
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
non-Chalcedonian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
(from: --/3/537 to: 2/12/537)
Interaction Location
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (tries to prevent Silverius from being returned to Rome from Patara)
Iulianus
Interactions
Interaction Date
536-7 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Praetorianus
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (False witness)
Marcus
Interactions
Interaction Date
536-7 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Scholasticus
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (False witness)
Liber Pontificalis I:293 (Duchesne)
Liberatus, Breviarium 22 (ACO 2.5: 137)
Victor of Tunnuna, chronica 542 (MGH auct. ant. 11:200)