Hilarius of Poitiers (male) c. 315 - 368 (from: --/--/315 to: --/--/368) View Case
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Phrygia [Central Anatolia]
yes
Liberius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)
Rhodanius of Toulouse
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Tolosa [Toulouse]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)
Valens of Mursa
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Mursa [Osijek]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)
Ursacius of Singidunum
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Singidunum [Belgrade]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)
Constantius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Correspondent
Person/group appealed to
Yes
Yes
Emperor (356)
Emperor (after September 359)
Bishops of Gaul
Interactions
Interaction Date
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Gallia [France]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)
Priests in Poitiers
Interactions
Interaction Date
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office
presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter, writer of letter)
Abra of Poitiers
Interactions
Interaction Date
356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office
Nun
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
kinship
Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)
160 Eastern bishops
Interactions
Interaction Date
September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
allegiance
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)
Ten Nicaean and ten 'heretical' bishops
Interactions
Interaction Date
after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint delegates to Constantinople)
Bishop (after September 359)
Saturninus of Arles
Interactions
Interaction Date
360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (excommunicated with help of exile)
Bishop (360)
Bishop (360)
Martinus of Tours
Interactions
Interaction Date
360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Hilarius of Poitiers, liber contra Auxentium 7 (PL 10:614);
Hilarius of Poitiers, ad Constantium 2.1-2 (CSEL 65:197-8);
Hilarius of Poitiers, in Constantium 2 and 12-15 (SC 334:170 and 192-8);
Hilarius of Poitiers, de synodis 1-2, 8 and 63 (PL 10:479-81, 485 and 522-3);
Hilarius of Poitiers, de trinitate 1-3, 4.1 and 10.4 (SC 443:202-386, SC 448:12 and SC 462:178);
Hilarius of Poitiers, Fragmentum historiarum A.5-9, B.3.2, B.7.1-2, B.7.5-11 and B.8.1-2 (CSEL 65:78-97, 155-6, 164-73 and 174-7);
Venantius Fortunatus, vita s. Hilarii 6 (MGH auct. ant. 4.2:3);
Hieronymus, chronica, ann. 356 (Jeanjean-Lancon, 92);
Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 100 (Ceresa-Gastaldo, 204);
Hieronymus, altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi 19 (CCSL 79B:48-9);
Faustinus et Marcellinus, libellus precum 24 (SC 504:130);
Prosper of Aquitaine, chronica 1096 (ann. 356) (MGH auct. ant. 9:455);
Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 3.14.41, 4.12.6 and 4.22 (SC 418:138, 242 and 300-312);
Sulpicius Severus, chronica 2.42 and 2.45.2-3 (SC 441:322 and 330);
Sulpicius Severus, vita Martini 6.7 and 7.1 (SC 133:266);
Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.39-40 (SC 493:200-216);
Epistula ab episcopis Gallicanis ad orientales episcopos 1-4 (CCSL 148:33-4);
Protogenes (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373) View Case
373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)
Edessa [Şanlıurfa]
Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
yes
Flavius Valens
Interactions
Interaction Date
373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
bishop of Antinoopolis
Interactions
Interaction Date
373 - before 379 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/379)
Interaction Location
Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Bishop (373 - before 379)
boys in Antinoopolis
Interactions
Interaction Date
(from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support?
Other Interaction Type
Yes (boys receive exorcism, forced to conversion by parents)
Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 4.18 (SC 530:248)
Lucius of Adrianopolis (male) mid fourth century, died c. 348 (from: --/--/343 to: --/--/348) View Case
before 343 - c. 344 (from: --/--/343 to: --/--/344)
Hadrianopolis [Tadmur]
yes
Constantius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 343 (from: --/--/343 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Iulius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
344? (from: --/--/344 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Person/group appealed to
Responsible for return
Yes
Yes
Athanasius, historia Arianorum 19.1
Athanasius, de fuga 3.3
Athanasius, apologia secunda 43.2
Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.15, 23 (NPNF)
Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 3.8, 24 (NPNF)
Meletius of Antioch (male) mid/late fourth century, died 381 (from: --/--/357 to: --/--/381) View Case
371/2 - c. 378 (from: --/--/371 to: --/--/378)
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Armenia [Armenia]
yes
Flavius Valens
Interactions
Interaction Date
378 (from: --/--/378 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
supporters of Meletius in Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
c. 381 (from: --/--/381 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support
Domnica
Interactions
Interaction Date
371/2 (from: --/--/372 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Eudoxius of Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
371/2 (from: --/--/372 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 5.5 (NPNF)
Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 4.12-13 (NPNF)
Bonifatius of Rome (male) early fifth century, died c. 422 (from: --/--/406 to: --/--/422) View Case
3/1/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 3/1/419 to: 10/4/419)
Roma [Rome]
yes
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/1/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 3/1/419 to: 10/4/419)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support, conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for return
Yes
Yes
Emperor (3/1/419 - 10/4/419)
Eulalius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/1/419-10/4/419 (from: 3/1/419 to: 10/4/419)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Rival bishop)
Interaction Date
8/2/419 (from: 8/2/419 to: 8/2/419)
Interaction Location
Ravenna [Ravenna]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of synod)
Bishop of Rome (3/1/419-10/4/419)
Bishop of Rome (8/2/419)
collectio Avellana 16, 18 (CSEL 35.1:61-5) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/60/mode/2up
Liber Pontificalis 44 (Duchesne I:89-92) https://archive.org/stream/bookofpopesliber00loom#page/88/mode/2up