Flavianus of Constantinople (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/449) View Case
449 (from: 8/8/449 to: --/--/449)
Ephesus [Selçuk]
Hypaipa [Günlüce (Datbey)]
no
Dioscorus of Alexandria
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Ephesus [Selçuk]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Saturninus
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
cubicularius
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Licinia Eudoxia
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (appeals to Theodosius II)
Theodosius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Person/group appealed to
Yes
Escort of Pulcheria
Interactions
Interaction Date
449/50 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/450)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Chrysaphius
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
spatharius (east)
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
monophysite
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Aelia Pulcheria
Interactions
Interaction Date
449/50 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/450)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Valentinianus III
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)
Aelia Galla Placidia
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)
Interaction Date
450 (from: --/--/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Pulcheria)
Empress (22/2/450)
Empress (450)
Leo of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)
Bishop of Rome (22/2/450)
Collectio Avellana 99 (CSEL 35.1:443) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/442/mode/2up
Marcellinus comes, chronica 449 (MGH auct. ant. 11:83): Flauianus episcopus in secunda aput Ephesum synodo ui Dioscori Alexandriae episcopi et Saturnini spadonis in Epipam exulatus est.
Theophanes, AM 5941.
ACO 2.1.1 epp. 2-4, 14.
Leo, epistulae 45, 54, 62, 63, 64, 77 (PL 54)
Eutyches (male) c. 380 - c. 456 (from: --/--/380 to: --/--/456) View Case
451 - ? (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Doliche [Dülük]
unknown
Leo of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
451 (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Theodosius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
451 (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Marcianus (emperor)
Interactions
Interaction Date
451 (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Leo, epistulae 84 (ACO 2.4:44), 93.3 (PL 54:939)
http://books.google.de/books?id=9fgQAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PT423#v=onepage&q&f=false
Theodorus (Anagnostes) Lector, historia ecclesiastica frg. 356 (GCS n.F. 3:100)
Timotheus Aelurus of Alexandria (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/460 to: --/--/460) View Case
460 - ? (from: --/--/460 to: --/--/--)
Alexandria [Alexandria]
Gangra [Çankırı]
unknown
Leo of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
460 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Timotheus Basilicus (Salophacialus)
Interactions
Interaction Date
460 (from: --/--/460 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Gennadius of Constantinople
Interactions
Interaction Date
after 460 (from: --/--/460 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Apollon (priest)
Interactions
Interaction Date
after 460 (from: --/--/460 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Chersonesos [Sevastopol]
Office
presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Stilas
Interactions
Interaction Date
460 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office
dux Aegypti
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Leo (emperor)
Interactions
Interaction Date
after 460 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support?
Correspondent
Person/group appealed to
Yes (receiver of letter)
Yes
Gelasius, Gesta de nomine Acacii (CSEL 35, n. 99:446);
Theodorus (Anagnostes) Lector, historia ecclesiastica 380 (GCS N.F. 3:107);
Zacharias, historia ecclesiastica 4.7--12, 5.1 (CSCO 83:178-86, 109-211; CSCO 87:124, 128-129, 145);
Evagrius, historia ecclesiastica 2.8-11 (SC 542:294);
Theophanes, AM 5951-2 (De Boor: 111-112);
Michael Syrus 9.1;
Collectio Avellana 56.2 (CSEL 35:125);
Liberatus, Breviarium 16 (ACO 2.5:125);