Elias of Jerusalem (male) early sixth century (from: --/--/457 to: --/--/518) View Case
516 - c. 518 (from: --/--/516 to: --/--/518)
Ierusalem [Jerusalem]
Castellum Paraxenense (in Aila?) [Eilat]
no
Olympus
Interactions
Interaction Date
516 (from: --/--/516 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
dux Palestinae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Anastasius
Interactions
Interaction Date
516 (from: --/--/516 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Iohannes
Interactions
Interaction Date
516 (from: --/--/516 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Ierusalem [Jerusalem]
Office
custos crucis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
non-Chalcedonian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict?
Severus of Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
before 516 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Eilas denied Severus communion)
Victor of Tunnuna, chronica 509 (MGH auct. ant. 11:194)
Silverius of Rome (male) mid sixth century, died 2/12/537 (from: --/--/536 to: 2/12/537) View Case
3/537 - 2/12/537 (from: --/3/537 to: 2/12/537)
Roma [Rome]
Patara [Gelemiş]
no
Vigilius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/537)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Successor in post
Yes
Yes
Yes
Flavius Belisarius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
magister militum per orientem
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
magister militum per orientem (3/537)
Iohannis, subdiaconus regionarius primae regionis
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support?
Responsible for rank change
Yes
Antonina
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
patricia
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for rank change
Yes
Yes
Xystus, subdiaconus regionarius regionis sextae
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Subdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict?
multitude in Palmaria
Interactions
Interaction Date
12/537 (from: --/12/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Palmaria insula [Palmarola]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
Bishop of Patara
Interactions
Interaction Date
537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/537)
Interaction Location
Patara [Gelemiş]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Pelagius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
537 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/537)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for moving exile to a different location
Yes
Theodora (empress)
Interactions
Interaction Date
(from: --/3/537 to: --/3/537)
Interaction Location
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
non-Chalcedonian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Interaction Date
(from: --/3/537 to: 2/12/537)
Interaction Location
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (tries to prevent Silverius from being returned to Rome from Patara)
Iulianus
Interactions
Interaction Date
536-7 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Praetorianus
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (False witness)
Marcus
Interactions
Interaction Date
536-7 (from: --/3/537 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Scholasticus
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (False witness)
Liber Pontificalis I:293 (Duchesne)
Liberatus, Breviarium 22 (ACO 2.5: 137)
Victor of Tunnuna, chronica 542 (MGH auct. ant. 11:200)
Euphemius of Constantinople (male) late fifth century (from: --/--/490 to: --/--/515) View Case
496 - 515 (from: --/--/496 to: --/--/515)
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Euchaita [Beyözü]
no
Anastasius
Interactions
Interaction Date
496 (from: --/--/496 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Macedonius II of Constantinople
Interactions
Interaction Date
496 (from: --/--/496 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Successor in post
Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes
Yes (money, other, assurance of no harm)
Archdeacon in Constantinople
Interactions
Interaction Date
496 (from: --/--/496 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Archdeacon
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support?
Other Interaction Type
Yes (divests Euphemius of pallium)
Ioannes of Nikiu, chronica 89.46;
Victor of Tunnuna, chronica 496 (MGH AA 11.2: 192);
Theodorus (Anagnostes) Lector, historia ecclesiastica 457 (GCS 53:128);
Malalas, chronica 16.11 (Dindorf, 400);
Theophanes, AM 5989 (de Boor, 140);
Chronicle of Zuqnin, Third part, 488-489, 497-498 (Harrak, 37-8);