Search Results

Here you will find brief information about all exile cases relating to the category/ies you searched for, listed by the person/group exiled in alphabetical order. Click on 'View Case' to research each record further.

Exile Cases

Exile

Exile Date

Sent From

Went To

Returned

Relationships

Office

Sources

Athanasius (male) (from: --/--/296 to: 2/5/373)
View Case

9/335 - 23/11/337 (from: 17/9/335 to: 23/11/337)

Tyrus [Tyre]

Col. Augusta Treverorum [Trier]

yes

Alexander

Interaction Date	337 (from: --/--/337 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (337)

Severianus

Interaction Date	337 (from: --/--/337 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Sirmium [Sremska Mitrovica]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Responsible for return	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (Joint attendant at imperial reception)

Bishop (337)

Flavius Valerius Constantinus

Interaction Date	11/335 (from: 6/11/335 to: 7/11/335)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to
Yes	Yes

Emperor (11/335)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	337 (from: --/--/337 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (337)

Flavius Iulius Constans

Interaction Date	335 (from: --/--/335 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict?

Correspondent
Yes (writer of letter)

Emperor (335)

Athanasius, apologia secunda 9.1-5, 71ff. Athanasius, epistula festalis 10

Hilarius of Poitiers (male) c. 315 - 368 (from: --/--/315 to: --/--/368)
View Case

356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)

Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]

Phrygia [Central Anatolia]

yes

Liberius of Rome

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop of Rome (356)

Rhodanius of Toulouse

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Tolosa [Toulouse]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Jointly condemned to exile)

Bishop (356)

Valens of Mursa

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Mursa [Osijek]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)

Bishop (356)

Ursacius of Singidunum

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Singidunum [Belgrade]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (addressee of polemical treatise)

Bishop (356)

Constantius II

Interaction Date	356 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Correspondent	Person/group appealed to
Yes	Yes

Emperor (356)
Emperor (after September 359)

Bishops of Gaul

Interaction Date	356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Gallia [France]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Bishop (356-360)

Priests in Poitiers

Interaction Date	356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office	presbyter
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter, writer of letter)

presbyter (356-360)

Abra of Poitiers

Interaction Date	356-360 (from: --/--/356 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Limonum/Pictavi [Poitiers]
Office	Nun
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	kinship

Correspondent
Yes (receiver of letter)

Nun (356-360)

160 Eastern bishops

Interaction Date	September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	allegiance

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of council)

Bishop (September 359)

Ten Nicaean and ten 'heretical' bishops

Interaction Date	after September 359 (from: --/9/359 to: --/--/360)
Interaction Location	Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint delegates to Constantinople)

Bishop (after September 359)

Saturninus of Arles

Interaction Date	360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Interaction Date	360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Col. Arelate [Arles]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	Arian
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Other Interaction Type
Yes (excommunicated with help of exile)

Bishop (360)
Bishop (360)

Martinus of Tours

Interaction Date	360 (from: --/--/360 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Visitor
Yes

(360)

Hilarius of Poitiers, liber contra Auxentium 7 (PL 10:614); Hilarius of Poitiers, ad Constantium 2.1-2 (CSEL 65:197-8); Hilarius of Poitiers, in Constantium 2 and 12-15 (SC 334:170 and 192-8); Hilarius of Poitiers, de synodis 1-2, 8 and 63 (PL 10:479-81, 485 and 522-3); Hilarius of Poitiers, de trinitate 1-3, 4.1 and 10.4 (SC 443:202-386, SC 448:12 and SC 462:178); Hilarius of Poitiers, Fragmentum historiarum A.5-9, B.3.2, B.7.1-2, B.7.5-11 and B.8.1-2 (CSEL 65:78-97, 155-6, 164-73 and 174-7); Venantius Fortunatus, vita s. Hilarii 6 (MGH auct. ant. 4.2:3); Hieronymus, chronica, ann. 356 (Jeanjean-Lancon, 92); Hieronymus, de viris illustribus 100 (Ceresa-Gastaldo, 204); Hieronymus, altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi 19 (CCSL 79B:48-9); Faustinus et Marcellinus, libellus precum 24 (SC 504:130); Prosper of Aquitaine, chronica 1096 (ann. 356) (MGH auct. ant. 9:455); Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 3.14.41, 4.12.6 and 4.22 (SC 418:138, 242 and 300-312); Sulpicius Severus, chronica 2.42 and 2.45.2-3 (SC 441:322 and 330); Sulpicius Severus, vita Martini 6.7 and 7.1 (SC 133:266); Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.39-40 (SC 493:200-216); Epistula ab episcopis Gallicanis ad orientales episcopos 1-4 (CCSL 148:33-4);

Paulus of Edessa (male) early sixth century, died 30/10/526 (from: --/--/510 to: 30/10/526)
View Case

7/522 - 3/526 (from: --/7/522 to: --/3/526)

Edessa [Şanlıurfa]

Euchaita [Beyözü]

yes

Asclepius of Edessa

Interaction Date	7/522 (from: --/7/522 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Edessa [Şanlıurfa]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop (7/522)

Iustinus

Interaction Date	522-526 (from: --/--/522 to: --/--/526)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Person/group appealed to	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes	Yes

Emperor (522-526)

Zacharias, historia ecclesiastica 8.4 (CSCO 84:75, 88:51) Chronicum Edessenum 89-92 (CSCO Scr. Syr. 3.4,1903: 9-10) https://archive.org/stream/chronicaminorapa00guid#page/8/mode/2up

Petrus Mongus (male) late fifth century, died 29/10/490 (from: --/--/454 to: 29/10/490)
View Case

477 - 482 (from: --/--/477 to: --/--/482)

Alexandria [Alexandria]

Euchaita [Beyözü]

yes

Flavius Zenon

Interaction Date	477-482 (from: --/--/477 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support, conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)	Responsible for return
Yes	Yes

Emperor (477-482)

Ioannes Talaia

Interaction Date	477-482 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Alexandria [Alexandria]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post	Other Interaction Type
Yes	Yes (reason for return)

Bishop (477-482)

Simplicius of Rome

Interaction Date	482 (from: --/--/482 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support?

Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes (conversion, )

Bishop of Rome (482)

Acacius of Constantinople

Interaction Date	482 (from: --/--/482 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support?

Responsible for return	Giver of benefaction to exile
Yes	Yes (conversion, )

Bishop (482)

Theodorus (Anagnostes) Lector, historia ecclesiastica 422-4 (GCS n.F. 3: 117); Theophanes, AM 5976 (de Boor 130); Collectio Avellana, epistula 70.4 (CSEL 35.1:156-7) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/156/mode/2up

Petrus Fullo (male) late fifth century, died 488 (from: --/--/463 to: --/--/488)
View Case

476 - 485 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/485)

Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]

Pityous [Pitsunda]

yes

Flavius Zenon

Interaction Date	476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (476)

Stephanus of Antioch

Interaction Date	476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Bishop (476)

Guards

Interaction Date	476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Guard
Yes

(476)

Malalas, chronica 15.6 (Dindorf 380-1); Joannes of Nikiu, chronica 88.43; Theophanes, AM 5969 (de Boor 125); Chronicle of Zuqnin, Third part, 488-489 (Harrak, 37)

Anastasius of Antioch (male) late sixth century, died 599 (from: --/--/561 to: --/--/599)
View Case

570 - 593 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/593)

Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]

yes

Iustinus II

Interaction Date	570 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (570)

Gregorius of Antioch

Interaction Date	570 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Ierusalem [Jerusalem]
Office	Monk
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Successor in post
Yes

Monk (570)

Gregorius Magnus

Interaction Date	between 570 and 593 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/593)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Correspondent	Responsible for return
Yes (writer of letter)	Yes

Bishop of Rome (between 570 and 593)

Flavius Mauricius Tiberius

Interaction Date	593 (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (593)

Theodosius (son of Maurice)

Interaction Date	593 (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible for return
Yes

Emperor (593)

Theophanes, AM 6062, 6087 (de Boor, 243, 272) Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.7, 25, 26, 28; 5.39; 7,27, 33; 8.2 (CCSL 140)

Refine Results

Gender
- - Male (6)
Only threatend with exile
- - No (6)
Refuge from judicial proceedings
- - No (6)
Exile as a result of asylum
- - No (6)
Offences
more
Legal type of exile
Deposed by synod?
- - No (4)
  - Yes (2)
Returned by synod?
- - No (5)
  - Unknown (1)
Synod of deposition or return
- - Eastern Synod (1)
  - First Synod Of Tyre (1)
Returned?
- - Yes (6)
Reason for return
- - Recalled (5)
  - Troublemaking (1)
Intended duration
- - Permanent (6)
Actual duration
more
Location of departure
more
Location of destination
Location of arrival
more
Type of location of arrival
Location of return
Religious status before exile
- - Clerical (6)
Religious status after exile
- - Clerical (6)
Office before exile
- - Bishop (6)
Office during exile
- - N/a (5)
  - Bishop (1)
Office after exile
- - Bishop (6)
Enforced rank change?
- - No (1)
Religious affiliation after exile
- - Nicaean (1)
Reason for leaving place of exile
more
Writings in exile?
- - Unknown (3)
  - Yes (3)
Activities related to doctrine
- - Attends Council At Seleucia In 359 And Several Councils In Gaul In 360, In Paris And Places Unknown; Brings Letter (Ab Episcopis Gallicanis Ad Orientales Episcopos) To Rome In 360. (1)
Related people
more
Death in exile?
- - No (6)
Venerated?
- - No (3)
  - Yes (3)
Exile start date (most numerous first)
more
- - 335 (1)
  - 356 (1)
  - 476 (1)
  - 477 (1)
  - 522 (1)
Exile end date (most numerous first)
more
- - 337 (1)
  - 360 (1)
  - 482 (1)
  - 485 (1)
  - 526 (1)
Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group
more

Search Results

Exile Cases

Refine Results

Gender

Only threatend with exile

Refuge from judicial proceedings

Exile as a result of asylum

Offences

Legal type of exile

Deposed by synod?

Returned by synod?

Synod of deposition or return

Returned?

Reason for return

Intended duration

Actual duration

Location of departure

Location of destination

Location of arrival

Type of location of arrival

Location of return

Religious status before exile

Religious status after exile

Office before exile

Office during exile

Office after exile

Enforced rank change?

Religious affiliation after exile

Reason for leaving place of exile

Writings in exile?

Activities related to doctrine

Related people

Death in exile?

Venerated?

Exile start date (most numerous first)

Exile end date (most numerous first)

Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group