Search Results

Here you will find brief information about all exile cases relating to the category/ies you searched for, listed by the person/group exiled in alphabetical order. Click on 'View Case' to research each record further.

Exile Cases

Exile

Exile Date

Sent From

Went To

Returned

Relationships

Office

Sources

Irenaeus (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/431 to: --/--/448)
View Case

435 - before 445 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/445)

Constantinopolis [Istanbul]

Petra [Petra]

yes

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	435 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (435)

Photius

Interaction Date	435 - before 445 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/445)
Interaction Location	Petra [Petra]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	support?

Companion
Yes

(435 - before 445)

Flavius Anthemius Isidorus

Interaction Date	435 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	praefectus urbis Constantinopolitanae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

praefectus urbis Constantinopolitanae (435)

ACO I.4:203 nos. 277-8

Photius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/435)
View Case

435 - ? (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/--)

Constantinopolis [Istanbul]

Petra [Petra]

unknown

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	435 (from: --/--/435 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (435)

ACO I.4:203 nos. 277-8

Alexander of Hierapolis (male) 431 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/431)
View Case

after 431- ? (from: --/--/431 to: --/--/--)

Hierapolis/Bambyke [Manbiǧ]

Famothis [Lake Mareotis]

unknown

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	after 431 (from: --/--/431 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	unknown
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (after 431)

ACO 1.4:203, no. 279

Flavianus of Constantinople (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/449)
View Case

449 (from: 8/8/449 to: --/--/449)

Ephesus [Selçuk]

Hypaipa [Günlüce (Datbey)]

Dioscorus of Alexandria

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Ephesus [Selçuk]
Office	Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop (449)

Saturninus

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	cubicularius
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

cubicularius (449)

Licinia Eudoxia

Interaction Date	22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (appeals to Theodosius II)

Empress (22/2/450)

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Person/group appealed to
Yes

Emperor (449)

Escort of Pulcheria

Interaction Date	449/50 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/450)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible Relic
Yes

(449/50)

Chrysaphius

Interaction Date	449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	spatharius (east)
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)	monophysite
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

spatharius (east) (449)

Aelia Pulcheria

Interaction Date	449/50 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/450)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Responsible Relic
Yes

Empress (449/50)

Valentinianus III

Interaction Date	22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)

Emperor (22/2/450)

Aelia Galla Placidia

Interaction Date	22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)

Interaction Date	450 (from: --/--/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Pulcheria)

Empress (22/2/450)
Empress (450)

Leo of Rome

Interaction Date	22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)

Bishop of Rome (22/2/450)

Collectio Avellana 99 (CSEL 35.1:443) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/442/mode/2up Marcellinus comes, chronica 449 (MGH auct. ant. 11:83): Flauianus episcopus in secunda aput Ephesum synodo ui Dioscori Alexandriae episcopi et Saturnini spadonis in Epipam exulatus est. Theophanes, AM 5941. ACO 2.1.1 epp. 2-4, 14. Leo, epistulae 45, 54, 62, 63, 64, 77 (PL 54)

Dorotheus of Marcianopolis (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/432)
View Case

432 - ? (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/--)

Marcianopolis [Devnya]

Caesarea [Kayseri]

unknown

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	432 (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (432)

Nestorius

Interaction Date	432-451 (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/451)
Interaction Location	Oasis Magna/Thebaidos [El-Kharga]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	support

Companion
Yes

(432-451)

ACO 1.4:203, no. 279 Iohannes Rufus, Plerophories (Nau, PO 8, 1911: 83), citing History composed by Timothy Aelurus. Barhadbessaba Arbaia (Nau, PO 9/5, 1913:493-677) 30

Meletius of Mopsuestia (male) 432 - ? (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/--)
View Case

432 - ? (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/--)

Mopsou(h)estia [Yakapınar]

Melitene [Malatya]

unknown

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	432 (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (432)

ACO 1.4:203, no. 279

Eutyches (male) c. 380 - c. 456 (from: --/--/380 to: --/--/456)
View Case

451 - ? (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)

Constantinopolis [Istanbul]

Doliche [Dülük]

unknown

Leo of Rome

Interaction Date	451 (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location	Roma [Rome]
Office	Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	cleric
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Bishop of Rome (451)

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	451 (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (451)

Marcianus (emperor)

Interaction Date	451 (from: --/--/451 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (451)

Leo, epistulae 84 (ACO 2.4:44), 93.3 (PL 54:939) http://books.google.de/books?id=9fgQAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PT423#v=onepage&q&f=false Theodorus (Anagnostes) Lector, historia ecclesiastica frg. 356 (GCS n.F. 3:100)

Donatist clerics and ministers (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

30/1/412 - ? (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)

Africa [n/a]

unknown

Flavius Honorius

Interaction Date	30/1/412 (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/1/412)

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	30/1/412 (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/1/412)

Seleucus

Interaction Date	30/1/412 (from: 30/1/412 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Africae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Africae (30/1/412)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.52.5

Manichaeans and Donatists (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

30/5/428 - ? (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Theodosius II

Interaction Date	30/5/428 (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/5/428)

Valentinianus III

Interaction Date	30/5/428 (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (30/5/428)

Flavius Florentius

Interaction Date	30/5/428 (from: 30/5/428 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Orientis (30/5/428)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.65.2-3

Refine Results

Gender
- - Male (7)
  - Unknown (2)
Only threatend with exile
- - No (7)
  - Unknown (2)
Refuge from judicial proceedings
- - No (7)
Exile as a result of asylum
- - No (7)
Offences
Legal type of exile
more
Additional punishment
Deposed by synod?
- - No (5)
  - Yes (2)
Returned by synod?
- - Unknown (7)
  - No (1)
Synod of deposition or return
- - Council Of Chalcedon (1)
  - Second Council Of Ephesus (1)
Returned?
Reason for return
- - Consecrated As Bishop (1)
Intended duration
- - Permanent (9)
Actual duration
Location of departure
more
Location of destination
more
Location of arrival
more
Type of location of arrival
Location of return
- - Tyrus [Tyre] (35.20, 33.27) (1)
Religious status before exile
Religious status after exile
- - Clerical (1)
Office before exile
Office during exile
- - N/a (9)
Office after exile
- - Bishop (1)
Enforced rank change?
- - Unknown (1)
  - Yes (1)
Religious affiliation before exile
- - Nestorian (3)
  - Donatists (2)
Religious affiliation during exile
- - Donatists (2)
Reason for leaving place of exile
- - N/a (6)
  - Other (1)
Writings in exile?
- - Unknown (8)
  - Yes (1)
Related people
more
Death in exile?
Reason for death
- - Either Coincidental Or Induced (1)
  - Unknown (1)
Venerated?
- - No (8)
  - Yes: Sanctae Memoriae (Coll. Avell.), Martyr (1)
Exile start date (most numerous first)
more
- - 432 (2)
  - 435 (2)
  - 412 (1)
  - 428 (1)
  - 431 (1)
Exile end date (most numerous first)
- - 445 (1)
  - 449 (1)
Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group
more

Search Results

Exile Cases

Refine Results

Gender

Only threatend with exile

Refuge from judicial proceedings

Exile as a result of asylum

Offences

Legal type of exile

Additional punishment

Deposed by synod?

Returned by synod?

Synod of deposition or return

Returned?

Reason for return

Intended duration

Actual duration

Location of departure

Location of destination

Location of arrival

Type of location of arrival

Location of return

Religious status before exile

Religious status after exile

Office before exile

Office during exile

Office after exile

Enforced rank change?

Religious affiliation before exile

Religious affiliation during exile

Reason for leaving place of exile

Writings in exile?

Related people

Death in exile?

Reason for death

Venerated?

Exile start date (most numerous first)

Exile end date (most numerous first)

Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group