Eusebius of Dorylaeum (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/429 to: --/--/451) View Case
449 - 451 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/451)
Ephesus [Selçuk]
yes
Leo of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (asylum)
Collectio Avellana, Gesta de nomine Acaci, epist. 99.11-16 (CSEL 35.1:444-5)
https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/444/mode/2up
Anianus of Antioch (male) mid fourth century (from: --/--/359 to: --/--/359) View Case
359 - ? (from: --/--/359 to: --/--/--)
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
unknown
Bassidius Lauricius
Interactions
Interaction Date
359 (from: --/--/359 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Seleucia ad Calycadnum/Tracheia [Silifke]
Office
comes et praeses Isauriae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
comes et praeses Isauriae (359)
Socrates, historia ecclesiastica 2.40
Flavianus of Constantinople (male) mid fifth century (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/449) View Case
449 (from: 8/8/449 to: --/--/449)
Ephesus [Selçuk]
Hypaipa [Günlüce (Datbey)]
no
Dioscorus of Alexandria
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Ephesus [Selçuk]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Saturninus
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
cubicularius
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Licinia Eudoxia
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (appeals to Theodosius II)
Theodosius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Person/group appealed to
Yes
Escort of Pulcheria
Interactions
Interaction Date
449/50 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/450)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Chrysaphius
Interactions
Interaction Date
449 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
spatharius (east)
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
monophysite
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Aelia Pulcheria
Interactions
Interaction Date
449/50 (from: --/--/449 to: --/--/450)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Valentinianus III
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)
Aelia Galla Placidia
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)
Interaction Date
450 (from: --/--/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Empress
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Pulcheria)
Empress (22/2/450)
Empress (450)
Leo of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
22/2/450 (from: 22/2/450 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Appeals to Theodosius II)
Bishop of Rome (22/2/450)
Collectio Avellana 99 (CSEL 35.1:443) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/442/mode/2up
Marcellinus comes, chronica 449 (MGH auct. ant. 11:83): Flauianus episcopus in secunda aput Ephesum synodo ui Dioscori Alexandriae episcopi et Saturnini spadonis in Epipam exulatus est.
Theophanes, AM 5941.
ACO 2.1.1 epp. 2-4, 14.
Leo, epistulae 45, 54, 62, 63, 64, 77 (PL 54)
Eulalius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/418 to: --/--/423) View Case
8/2/419 - 18/3/419 (from: 8/2/419 to: 18/3/419)
Roma [Rome]
yes
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
15/1/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 15/1/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Emperor (15/1/419 - 10/4/419)
Aurelius Anicius Symmachus
Interactions
Interaction Date
29/3/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 29/3/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
praefectus urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
praefectus urbis Romae (29/3/419 - 10/4/419)
corporati and maiores regionum
Interactions
Interaction Date
29/3/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 29/3/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/4/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 3/4/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Emperor (3/4/419 - 10/4/419)
people and clergy of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
423 (from: --/--/423 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (informants of death of rival)
collectio Avellana 20-29 (CSEL 35.1:61-5) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/66/mode/2up
Liber Pontificalis 44 (Duchesne I:89-92) https://archive.org/stream/bookofpopesliber00loom#page/88/mode/2up