Search Results

Here you will find brief information about all exile cases relating to the category/ies you searched for, listed by the person/group exiled in alphabetical order. Click on 'View Case' to research each record further.

Your Search

- Keyword:
- %22Leo%2C epistulae%22 [x]

Results found: 2

Exile Cases

Exile

Exile Date

Sent From

Went To

Returned

Relationships

Office

Sources

Monastic supporters of Eutyches, Carosus and Dorotheus (unknown) early fifth century (from: --/--/432 to: --/--/432)
View Case

452 - ? (from: --/--/452 to: --/--/--)

monasteries ‘where they could do no harm’ [n/a]

unknown

Marcianus (emperor)

Interaction Date	452 (from: --/--/452 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (452)

Leo, epistulae 81 (ACO 2.4:90) and 86 (ACO 2.4:95)

Followers of Eunomius (unknown) Date: Unknown
View Case

21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: --/--/--)

unknown

Flavius Arcadius

Interaction Date	21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (21 or 22/3/396)

Flavius Honorius

Interaction Date	21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location	Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office	Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

Emperor (21 or 22/3/396)

Flavius Caesarius

Interaction Date	21 or 22/3/396 (from: 21/3/396 to: 22/3/396)
Interaction Location
Office	PPO Orientis
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)	lay
Relationship Quality	conflict

Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes

PPO Orientis (21 or 22/3/396)

Codex Theodosianus 16.5.31-32

Refine Results

Gender
- - Unknown (2) [x]
  - Male (14)
Only threatend with exile
- - No (2)
Refuge from judicial proceedings
- - No (2)
Exile as a result of asylum
- - No (2)
Offences
- - Heresy (1)
Legal type of exile
- - Pellere (1)
  - Unknown (1)
Deposed by synod?
- - No (1)
Returned by synod?
- - Unknown (2)
Returned?
- - Unknown (2)
Intended duration
- - Permanent (2)
Actual duration
- - Unknown (2)
Location of destination
- - Monasteries ‘Where They Could Do No Harm’ [N/a] (1)
Religious status before exile
- - Ascetic (1)
  - Unknown (1)
Religious status after exile
- - Unknown (1)
Office before exile
- - Monk (1)
  - Unknown (1)
Office during exile
- - N/a (2)
Office after exile
- - Unknown (1)
Enforced rank change?
- - Unknown (1)
Writings in exile?
- - Unknown (2)
Related people
more
Death in exile?
- - Unknown (2)
Venerated?
- - No (2)
Exile start date (most numerous first)
- - 396 (1)
  - 452 (1)
Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group

Search Results

Your Search

Exile Cases

Refine Results

Gender

Only threatend with exile

Refuge from judicial proceedings

Exile as a result of asylum

Offences

Legal type of exile

Deposed by synod?

Returned by synod?

Returned?

Intended duration

Actual duration

Location of destination

Religious status before exile

Religious status after exile

Office before exile

Office during exile

Office after exile

Enforced rank change?

Writings in exile?

Related people

Death in exile?

Venerated?

Exile start date (most numerous first)

Quality of Relationship with exiled Person / Group