Petrus Fullo (male) late fifth century, died 488 (from: --/--/463 to: --/--/488) View Case
471 - 476 (from: --/--/471 to: --/--/476)
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Oasis Magna/Thebaidos [El-Kharga]
yes
Leo of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
471 (from: --/--/471 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Flavius Basiliscus
Interactions
Interaction Date
476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
monophysite
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
Gelasius, Gesta de nomine Acacii (CSEL 35, n. 99: 440 and 450);
Liberatus, Breviarum 17 (ACO 2.5: 130);
Theodorus (Anagnostes) Lector, historia ecclesiastia 392 (GCS 53:110);
Theophanes, AM 5967
Petrus Fullo (male) late fifth century, died 488 (from: --/--/463 to: --/--/488) View Case
476 - 485 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/485)
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Pityous [Pitsunda]
yes
Flavius Zenon
Interactions
Interaction Date
476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Stephanus of Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Office
Bishop
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Guards
Interactions
Interaction Date
476 (from: --/--/476 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Malalas, chronica 15.6 (Dindorf 380-1);
Joannes of Nikiu, chronica 88.43;
Theophanes, AM 5969 (de Boor 125);
Chronicle of Zuqnin, Third part, 488-489 (Harrak, 37)
Ursicinus of Rome (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/355 to: --/--/381) View Case
11/366 - 9/367 (from: --/11/366 to: --/8/367)
Roma [Rome]
yes
followers of Ursicinus
Interactions
Interaction Date
366 - 9/367 (from: --/--/366 to: --/9/367)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support
Flavius Valentinianus
Interactions
Interaction Date
366 - 9/367 (from: --/--/366 to: --/9/367)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for return
Yes
Yes
Vettius Agorius Praetextatus
Interactions
Interaction Date
9/367 (from: --/9/367 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
praefectus urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
pagan
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support?
Person/group appealed to
Responsible for return
Yes
Yes
praefectus urbis Romae (9/367)
Damasus
Interactions
Interaction Date
11/366 (from: --/11/366 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
collectio Avellana 1.11, 5 (CSEL 35.1:4, 48)
https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/48/mode/2up
Ammianus Marcellinus 27.3.12-13, 27.9.9
Sozomenus, historia ecclesiastica 2.23 (NPNF)
Anastasius of Antioch (male) late sixth century, died 599 (from: --/--/561 to: --/--/599) View Case
570 - 593 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/593)
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
yes
Iustinus II
Interactions
Interaction Date
570 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Gregorius of Antioch
Interactions
Interaction Date
570 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Ierusalem [Jerusalem]
Office
Monk
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Gregorius Magnus
Interactions
Interaction Date
between 570 and 593 (from: --/--/570 to: --/--/593)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Correspondent
Responsible for return
Yes (writer of letter)
Yes
Bishop of Rome (between 570 and 593)
Flavius Mauricius Tiberius
Interactions
Interaction Date
593 (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
Theodosius (son of Maurice)
Interactions
Interaction Date
593 (from: --/--/593 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support
Responsible for return
Yes
Theophanes, AM 6062, 6087 (de Boor, 243, 272)
Gregorius Magnus, epistula 1.7, 25, 26, 28; 5.39; 7,27, 33; 8.2 (CCSL 140)
Bonifatius of Rome (male) early fifth century, died c. 422 (from: --/--/406 to: --/--/422) View Case
3/1/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 3/1/419 to: 10/4/419)
Roma [Rome]
yes
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/1/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 3/1/419 to: 10/4/419)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
support, conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Responsible for return
Yes
Yes
Emperor (3/1/419 - 10/4/419)
Eulalius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/1/419-10/4/419 (from: 3/1/419 to: 10/4/419)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Rival bishop)
Interaction Date
8/2/419 (from: 8/2/419 to: 8/2/419)
Interaction Location
Ravenna [Ravenna]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Other Interaction Type
Yes (Joint attendant of synod)
Bishop of Rome (3/1/419-10/4/419)
Bishop of Rome (8/2/419)
collectio Avellana 16, 18 (CSEL 35.1:61-5) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/60/mode/2up
Liber Pontificalis 44 (Duchesne I:89-92) https://archive.org/stream/bookofpopesliber00loom#page/88/mode/2up