Pelagius (male) c. 350 - 420 (from: --/--/350 to: --/--/420) View Case
13/4/418 - ? (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Roma [Rome]
no
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Theodosius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Caelestius
Interactions
Interaction Date
13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
ascetic
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (joint exile)
Codex canonum (PL 56:490-93)
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=R19EImjpsB0C&pg=PT229#v=onepage&q&f=false
Caelestius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/390 to: --/--/431) View Case
13/4/418 - ? (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Roma [Rome]
no
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Theodosius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Pelagius
Interactions
Interaction Date
13/4/418 (from: 13/4/418 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
ascetic
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (joint exile)
Codex canonum (PL 56:490-93)
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=R19EImjpsB0C&pg=PT229#v=onepage&q&f=false
Caelestius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/390 to: --/--/431) View Case
c. 429 - ? (from: --/--/429 to: --/--/--)
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
no
Theodosius II
Interactions
Interaction Date
c. 429 (from: --/--/429 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Marius Mercator
Interactions
Interaction Date
c. 429 (from: --/--/429 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Constantinopolis [Istanbul]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
ACO 1.3:5-9; 1.2:85-88; 1.5.1:65
Monks at Antioch (male) late fourth century (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373) View Case
c. 373 -? (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/--)
Antiochia/Theoupolis [Antakya]
Neocaesarea [Niksar]
no
Flavius Valens
Interactions
Interaction Date
c. 373 (from: --/--/373 to: --/--/373)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Theodoret, historia ecclesiastica 4.22.36 (SC 530:290)
Iovinianus (male) late fourth century, died before 409 (from: --/--/390 to: --/--/409) View Case
6/3/398? - before 409 (from: 6/3/398 to: --/--/409)
Italy [Italy]
Boa [Bua island, ÄŒiovo]
no
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
6/3/398? (from: 6/3/398 to: 6/3/398)
Interaction Location
Mediolan(i)um [Milan]
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Felix
Interactions
Interaction Date
6/3/398 (from: 6/3/398 to: 6/3/398)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
praefectus urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
praefectus urbis Romae (6/3/398)
Codex Theodosianus 16.5.53
Siricius, epistula 7.4 (PL 13:1171-2)
Ambrosius, epistula 15 (CSEL 82.1:112-5)